Invest in science

Pushing the frontiers of knowledge with the meta-problem

Science pays off big-time

Scientific research produces more bang for our buck than any other form of investment. It’s different from most other investments in two key ways: it takes longer to pay off, but the impact of the results is exponentially greater.

How do we choose the research topics today that will make our lives even better tomorrow? Which problem (or cluster of problems) should we choose to solve? Which will give us the best bang for our buck? That is a challenge that can be solved using the Meta-Problem Method.

The  method is about choosing the best problem to solve, but only after you’ve defined the goals you care about, explored your many options, and weighed the trade-offs. To learn more about the Meta-Problem Method, click here.

Modern life is built on science

The lives we lead today are made possible by the scientific discoveries we made in the past. From the food on our plates to the phones in our hands, from the medicines we take to how we travel and transport things, from the clothes we wear to how we teach our kids, all are better today because of science.

Science is about discovery, and the research often starts decades before it has a practical impact on the world. All the more reason to choose our research investments wisely.

Discoveries can be used for good or bad, so we need to think carefully about the tradeoffs and unforeseen consequences of our research investments. Research into nuclear fusion gave us a new source of power, but it also led to the most devastating weapons humans have ever had.

How do we choose a topic?

The long time to results makes it hard to pick the most fruitful research topics today, but there are some rules of thumb.

If a dollar spent on research is likely to generate a hundred dollars in benefit, it’s clearly a top investment candidate. Conversely, if it’s going to take a lot of effort for modest gains, there may be better ways to spend the money.

Practical, personal and scientific priorities all have an impact on our choice of research projects.

Questions and tradeoffs to think about

Uncertainty, tradeoffs and unintended consequences are part of the deal when you tackle a decision like which scientific research to invest in.

For example:

  • Who will benefit from this research? How do we get the most benefit for the most people?
  • How much time, talent and money are we prepared to put into this work? How passionate and committed are the research team?
  • Will our research complement the work of other scientists in the field?
  • Can we borrow insights from other fields that could make our work better or faster?
  • What other exploration do we have to give up if we choose this line of research?
  • What other research work could be boosted by the project we are considering?
  • Can we communicate the work and its value in an understandable way, so we win public, political and financial support?

Choose an example below to learn more about the Meta-Problem Method and how it can guide your choices

Reduce poverty

Figuring out how to give people enough, with the meta-problem

When fate takes a hand

Suppose you found yourself without enough resources to weather a storm. Maybe after a job loss, an illness, or a broken car. What do you hope would happen next?

Most people living in poverty today, at some point in the past experienced a bump in the road. Sometimes their biggest “mistake” was to be born into a family experiencing poverty, or to have the misfortune of poor health.

The question is which problem (or cluster of problems) we should choose to solve. Where will our efforts lead to the greatest reduction in poverty for our investment dollars?

The Meta-Problem Method is about choosing the best problem to solve, but only after you’ve defined the goals you care about, explored your many options, and weighed the trade-offs. To learn more about the Meta-Problem Method, click here.

A good start in life

Reducing poverty is at its core about creating a system in which people are supported when they need it.

By ensuring children start their lives well-fed and educated, we increase their life-long ability to contribute to the world.

In our modern world, individuals and societies with surplus resources could easily provide for the needs of the world while still having very comfortable lives themselves.

How much is enough?

While we have official benchmarks for poverty, there is not much discussion on the other side of the scales about what counts as too much.

What should rich individuals and countries give up to improve the lives of those in poverty? Should we only aspire to eliminate extreme poverty, or can the world’s rich support a higher standard of living for all? How should we choose?

Early action pays

The superhero Mr. Incredible complained “No matter how many times you save the world, it always manages to get back in jeopardy again. Sometimes I just want it to stay saved!”

Fighting poverty invites the same kind of frustration, as individuals and societies experience challenges and need extra support to recover.

Without a way to provide support in the moment, people often find themselves needing much more help over years or indefinitely.

See the examples below to learn how the Meta-Problem Method can help you
fight poverty!

Reform health and healthcare

How to improve health and health care with the Meta-Problem Method

Treat the whole human

Improving healthcare with limited resources means balancing individual and societal needs, while treating physical and mental health as tightly linked topics. The latter is one of the best opportunities to improve our current health systems.

​Individual and societal health decisions are intertwined. Add in government or corporate choices which can promote or diminish peoples’ health, and you have a recipe for complexity, confusion, higher costs and worse outcomes.

The question is which problem (or cluster of problems) should we choose to solve? Which will give us the best bang for our buck? The Meta-Problem Method is designed to help.

Using the method is about choosing the best problem to solve, but only after you’ve defined the goals you care about, explored your many options, and weighed the trade-offs. To learn more about the Meta-Problem Method, click here.

The importance of individual choice

Depending on your circumstances you might be facing choices about your own individual health, supporting people around you, or changing the health care system.

Health decisions are deeply personal. Any system we design needs to honor those choices and individual needs.

This is part of the challenge created by separating how we treat physical and mental health. Individuals often use up their limited resources fighting battles, some inside themselves, some external, leaving little energy for the rest of their needs.

A system that supports good individual decisions will improve overall health.

Questions to ask yourself

How can a limited number of doctors, nurses, hospitals and supplies best serve a population of patients in need? How do we weigh the trade-offs between allowing same-day visits and delaying scheduled visits?

What is the right population of medical professionals to serve patient needs? How can we create an environment where the right number of people choose a career in healthcare?

How do we balance the costs with the benefits? How can we measure progress?

A dollar spent in one part of the world can have a dramatically larger impact than in other regions. How do we design a system that reflects our values while serving all needs?

What am I willing and able to do? How can I apply my skillset to this problem? Which options will provide the greatest return compared to the effort involved?

Choose an example below to learn more about the Meta-Problem Method and how it can help guide your choices.

Upgrade education

How to make education better using the Meta-Problem Method

Every child’s right

A great teacher can entirely change the trajectory of their students. Figuring out how to provide that experience to as many students as possible while serving everyone is challenging.

Layer in limited resources, and the need to create a system which is sustainable indefinitely, and you have a high-stakes dilemma on your hands.

That’s the kind of challenge the Meta-Problem Method is designed to tackle. The method helps you choose the best problem to solve, but only after you’ve defined the goals you care about, explored your many options, and weighed the trade-offs. To learn more about the Meta-Problem Method, click here.

How should we invest?

The first challenge is to decide what should we give to our students, and the second is who pays for it. Both issues are intertwined.

Parents sometimes choose non-public schools because they are able and willing to invest more of their personal resources. College students in some countries pay drastically more for their education because of the way college is funded. Some vocations require you to pay out of pocket for your education, while others provide on-the-job training.

The consequences of a change today may only be fully realized decades from now. For example, take away or add a certain kind of support for elementary school, and it will take over a decade to see how it impacts those students as adults.

Facing the tradeoffs

Our quest for efficiency in education raises difficult questions. For example, if kids have almost as good an experience when they have 20 classmates as 30, is it worth losing a couple kids who need more individual attention?

The relentless push for more efficiency takes a toll on teachers too. Over the past several years educators have been burning out at record rates.

If we want a future with qualified doctors, engineers and teachers, we need to maintain the availability of college. If we want to have an educated population who can follow a budget or apply for a job, we need to achieve at least moderate quality for our youngest citizens.

Questions to explore

Which students are not being served with our current level of funding? What changes could we make to bridge the gap?

How are we serving our current population of students? Would more or fewer resources lead to substantially different outcomes? How can we tell what the future impact will really be?

Who should pay for high-quality education? Who will benefit from the investment?

What are we willing and able to do? How can greater clarity help us make good decisions? Which options will provide the greatest return compared to the effort involved?

Choose an example below to learn more about the Meta-Problem Method and how it can help us achieve a high-quality education for all our students.

Fight climate change

How to tackle climate change with the Meta-Problem Method

Climate change is a dilemma

The future of all life on this planet, including our children and grandchildren, depends on how successful we are at fighting climate change. The science gets clearer every year that the path we’re on is a dead end, and the “dead” part is likely us humans.

The question is which problem (or cluster of problems) should we choose to solve? Which will give us the best bang for our buck, given our limited resources?

The Meta-Problem Method is about choosing the best problem to solve, but only after you’ve defined the goals you care about, explored your many options, and weighed the trade-offs. To learn more about the Meta-Problem Method, click here.

How much will you give up?

The vast scale of climate change is daunting. Solving it requires individual actions from all of us, but also collective action at the level of communities and countries across our world.

The key decision we each need to make is what we’re willing to give up personally to solve a given problem.  For example, one of the simplest things you can do is to quit eating red meat – one meal with beef has the same environmental impact as multiple meals with other protein options.

Questions to ask yourself

What actions can I take in my personal and work life to reduce climate change? Switching to energy efficient light bulbs? Minimizing the number of documents I print?  Risking a stock-out to reduce waste​ in the grocery store I manage?

What actions can I influence others to take? Start with your family and friends, then think bigger, like communication campaigns, changing government standards like mileage rules for vehicles, or teaching kids the consequences of climate change.

What am I willing and able to do? How can I apply my skillset to this problem? Which options will provide the greatest return compared to the effort involved?

A person hugging an orangutan.

Multiply your impact

You can pursue a portfolio of actions that will together impact your goals. However, if you want to reduce the impacts of climate change at scale, you will need to move beyond direct action to influencing others.

We all lead busy and time-poor lives, so be realistic, and remember that there are millions if not billions of people doing what they can.

Choose an example below to learn more about the
Meta-Problem Method and how it can help guide your choices

Improve government

How to improve government with the Meta-Problem Method

Resources versus needs

Government needs to balance many competing priorities and values, but it is constrained by limited resources, as are we. Identifying and managing tradeoffs is inescapable.

The question then is which problem (or cluster of problems) should we choose to solve? Where will our efforts lead to the greatest improvement in our government?

That is a dilemma you can solve with the Meta-Problem Method. It is about choosing the best problem to solve, but only after you’ve defined the goals you care about, explored your many options, and weighed the trade-offs. To learn more about the Meta-Problem Method click here.

What can I do?

The key decision we each need to make is what we’re willing to give up personally (time, convenience, money) to solve a given problem.

In the case of improving government, your choices could include working from the inside by committing your career to government service. Or you could use your nights and weekends to volunteer or take political actions.

Key questions to ask yourself.

  • Which causes are most important to me personally? Can I get started with something small or get involved with a group to learn what my options are? Talking to people on the other side of the issue can help you understand the complexity and clarify your beliefs.
  • Do I want to work in government directly to deliver the improvements I desire? First-hand experience of the inner workings of government can help you understand why it has so many problems and give you smarter ideas for how to address them.
  • What am I willing and able to do? How can I apply my skillset to this problem? Which options will provide the greatest return compared to the effort involved?

How can I multiply my impact?

With smart focus and a dash of luck, influencing government is a great opportunity to have a huge impact. When your actions shape new policies, hundreds, thousands, or even millions of people can benefit from those changes.

Choose an example below to learn more about the
Meta-Problem Method and how it can help guide your choices.